These days most people keep their selves updated through surfing and updating information in the internet. This phenomenon leads to the freedom of writing any kinds of articles in a wide range of social platforms. While some people quite sure to post any kinds of articles, I side with those who feel that only selected people can share their idea to be published on the internet.

On the one hand, it is a very good chance for citizens to write everything they know on the internet. Firstly, before this era, some people who are truly able of writing are hesitated to publish their writings so that they write only for their personal consumptions. From now on, they have more opportunities to share their minds freely without any charges and any pressure like sending their writings to online newspapers, blog, or journal. Secondly, it also opens to a new alternative of income. While facing difficulties in getting proper jobs, some people can make this chance to be their butter and bread by becoming free writers for a wide range of social platforms with good compensations. Thirdly, it also inspires the young generation to be more productive in sharing their knowledge rather than sending negative comments in social medias. Nowadays, we can easily spot some young netizens who share negativity by giving hate speech to influencers.

On the other hand, it is better to restrict what kind of writings are feasible and valid to be published. To begin with, it will be better if the editors put some requirements on the internet in order the writers are well informed and more careful to share their minds. Such as the editors will only receive writers who are certificated, or putting some restriction for sensitive issues to be published. Furthermore, filtering the topics which are well enough to be digested by citizens will be good in order the readers will be more educated and receive valid sources. Although eliminating some points, the social media editors need to do this to reach the goal of giving true information to all people.

In conclusion, there some positive sides of opening large chances to people in writing anything they want. I, on balance, convince that it will be more effective to restrict writings which are 100% real and feasible to be published.

many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable nowadays anyone can post news on the internet. overconsumption of sugar is unhealthy. immigration has a major impact on the society. nowadays, parents are allowing their children to use tablets and smartphones to enhancelearning. the percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last in recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. some people believe that the internet has reduced the need for studying facts in history and recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by most of people believe that university tuition fees should not be free for students. some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing due to the rapid development and expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small, local in some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years farming is the backbone of every country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate to enter in this in many countries today, parents are able to choose to send their children to single-sex schools young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age. in some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their one of your friends recently had a birthday celebration, but you missed it and you forgot to